|
Post by tomhet on Jul 9, 2007 3:06:44 GMT -5
The other day I was watching the scene of Walking with dinosaurs in which the Liopleurodon devours an Allosaurus. I had not seen that scene for quite a long time and it got me thinking, why do they depict the Liopleurodon so big? Do they really have evidence?
As far as I know, the biggest marine reptile was some kind of Shonisaurus found in Canada which reached the incredible lenght of 21 mts (and which surprisingly enough lived in the Triassic). The Liopleurodon measured around 12-15 mts, didn't it?
How did the BBC guys get the idea of a Liopleurodon that big? Did they just get carried away?
|
|
|
Post by thetyrantlizard on Jul 9, 2007 11:24:26 GMT -5
The creators of WwD exercised creative license and grossly exaggerated the size of liopleurodon (sorry, Thor ). Liopleurodon ferox is around 5-7 meters on average, and 10 meters or so at best; weight would have been 0.75 to 2.5 tons. There is partial evidence of a pliosaur that was much larger, but it isn't a liopleurodon. www.plesiosaur.com/plesiosaurs/liopleurodon.php
|
|
|
Post by tomhet on Jul 9, 2007 17:25:10 GMT -5
That site is awesome, very thorough.
|
|
|
Post by dinotoyblog on Dec 13, 2007 16:45:24 GMT -5
Agreed- my main 'competition', the database is very valuable. My website is www.plesiosauria.com by the way.
|
|
|
Post by swiftpawfatfox on May 18, 2008 16:33:55 GMT -5
The BBC people seem to do alot of that for these shows. What's wrong with them simply letting viewers know that some of the info is just assumptions and hypothesis?
|
|